People are unlikely to forgive someone they don’t believe is building a truthful apology. Furthermore, people don’t desire to forgive people they think enemies. They want to hate them, so that they hate to forgive them. They want to have the transgression substantiate their earlier appraisal or viewpoint.
Apologies could be enormously useful when it’s time to resolving conflict, repairing hurt emotions, nurturing forgiveness, and improving relationships in both our individual and specialized lifestyles. They enhance relationship promise and satisfaction, employee faithfulness and pleasure, emotions of belief, and cooperation. An apology can even keep you out of the courtroom. Despite the fact that attorneys are inclined to caution their customers to avoid apologies such as plague, fearing that they are equal to an admission of guilt, reports show that while possible plaintiffs accept an apology, they are more likely to settle out of court for less money.
But as anyone can tell you, apologies don’t always work. At times they seem to fall on deaf ears. This can be because the person or persons we are seeking forgiveness from really aren’t interested in forgiving, or because the transgression itself is deemed simply unforgivable. But more often than not, our apologies fall flat because we apologize the wrong way.
So what is the right way? How should you apologize to your coworker, customer, friend, or spouse, in order to be sure that your already bad situation doesn’t end up even worse? Until recently, there has been very little psychological research focusing on what constitutes a “good” apology. A new set of studies, however, reveals that different kinds of apologies appeal to different kinds of people, and that the key to an effective apology lies in thinking carefully about your audience.
Offers of compensation are an attempt to restore balance through some redeeming action. Sometimes the compensation is tangible, like paying to repair or replace your neighbor’s fence when you inadvertently back your car into it, or running out to get your girlfriend a new phone when you accidentally drop hers into the toilet.
Expressions of empathy, on the other hand, involve recognizing and expressing concern over the suffering you caused. Through expressions of empathy, the victim feels understood and valued as a partner in the relationship, and trust is restored.
People who have an independent self-concept think of themselves primarily as individual, autonomous agents, completely separate from others. They tend to be focused mainly on their own rights, feelings, and goals, and as a result, experience transgressions as a personal injury or betrayal. No surprise then that they respond most favorably to apologies that offer compensation. The United States is a particularly independent, individualistic society, which may explain why American juries seem to love doling out lots of money as compensation for pain and suffering.
People with a more relational self-concept see themselves as primarily defined by their relationships with significant others. This type of self-concept is more common among women, for whom relationship ups and downs tend to loom large. When your self-concept is relational, you are focused on creating, maintaining and strengthening the relationships in your life. Transgressions are experienced as betrayals of mutual respect and belief, and consequently, apologies are most effective when they include expressions of empathy, rather than offers of compensation.
Finally, people with a collective self-concept see themselves first and foremost as members of the important groups, organizations, and cultures to which they belong. When you are a part of a group, whether it’s your family, your company, or your society, there are rules that govern how you are supposed to behave. For instance, baseball players aren’t allowed to take steroids. Accountants aren’t allowed to fool around with the books. Politicians can’t break the laws that they are elected to create and protect. Members of my family aren’t allowed to violate the rules of grammar. Transgressions are experienced as betrayals of the rules or values of the group, and thus, apologies that offer acknowledgment of violated rules and norms are your best bet for restoring your good standing with the other group members.
When crafting your apology, remember to ask yourself: Who am I talking to, and what are they looking for in my apology? What troubles them the most about what I did? Was my transgression perceived as a personal injury, betrayal of the relationship, or betrayal of the code of behavior of our group?
If you are not certain, consider how a wounded party most often discusses on themselves do they concentrate on their own personal qualities, their main relationships, or the significant communities to which they belong? Knowing something on how the person you aggrieved thinks of him or herself is your first evidence to what might be bothering them most, and may help you to apologize in the best way.
When I’m sad, everyone seems to be sad. I do not feel a part of the group. I usually guide the group, or am a key to it. I usually don’t mind about the current group, but the future one. Like, my family right now means crouch. When I insult them, it effects very little. But my future family means much more to me than the present. If you endanger my future family, or make fun of my idea of this future family, I’m hurt. And I feel for not just myself, but all people.
Copyright by Lucy who likes shopping online, going fishing, often searches replica coach purses and fashion things on the Internet.
Apologies could be enormously useful when it’s time to resolving conflict, repairing hurt emotions, nurturing forgiveness, and improving relationships in both our individual and specialized lifestyles. They enhance relationship promise and satisfaction, employee faithfulness and pleasure, emotions of belief, and cooperation. An apology can even keep you out of the courtroom. Despite the fact that attorneys are inclined to caution their customers to avoid apologies such as plague, fearing that they are equal to an admission of guilt, reports show that while possible plaintiffs accept an apology, they are more likely to settle out of court for less money.
But as anyone can tell you, apologies don’t always work. At times they seem to fall on deaf ears. This can be because the person or persons we are seeking forgiveness from really aren’t interested in forgiving, or because the transgression itself is deemed simply unforgivable. But more often than not, our apologies fall flat because we apologize the wrong way.
So what is the right way? How should you apologize to your coworker, customer, friend, or spouse, in order to be sure that your already bad situation doesn’t end up even worse? Until recently, there has been very little psychological research focusing on what constitutes a “good” apology. A new set of studies, however, reveals that different kinds of apologies appeal to different kinds of people, and that the key to an effective apology lies in thinking carefully about your audience.
Offers of compensation are an attempt to restore balance through some redeeming action. Sometimes the compensation is tangible, like paying to repair or replace your neighbor’s fence when you inadvertently back your car into it, or running out to get your girlfriend a new phone when you accidentally drop hers into the toilet.
Expressions of empathy, on the other hand, involve recognizing and expressing concern over the suffering you caused. Through expressions of empathy, the victim feels understood and valued as a partner in the relationship, and trust is restored.
People who have an independent self-concept think of themselves primarily as individual, autonomous agents, completely separate from others. They tend to be focused mainly on their own rights, feelings, and goals, and as a result, experience transgressions as a personal injury or betrayal. No surprise then that they respond most favorably to apologies that offer compensation. The United States is a particularly independent, individualistic society, which may explain why American juries seem to love doling out lots of money as compensation for pain and suffering.
People with a more relational self-concept see themselves as primarily defined by their relationships with significant others. This type of self-concept is more common among women, for whom relationship ups and downs tend to loom large. When your self-concept is relational, you are focused on creating, maintaining and strengthening the relationships in your life. Transgressions are experienced as betrayals of mutual respect and belief, and consequently, apologies are most effective when they include expressions of empathy, rather than offers of compensation.
Finally, people with a collective self-concept see themselves first and foremost as members of the important groups, organizations, and cultures to which they belong. When you are a part of a group, whether it’s your family, your company, or your society, there are rules that govern how you are supposed to behave. For instance, baseball players aren’t allowed to take steroids. Accountants aren’t allowed to fool around with the books. Politicians can’t break the laws that they are elected to create and protect. Members of my family aren’t allowed to violate the rules of grammar. Transgressions are experienced as betrayals of the rules or values of the group, and thus, apologies that offer acknowledgment of violated rules and norms are your best bet for restoring your good standing with the other group members.
When crafting your apology, remember to ask yourself: Who am I talking to, and what are they looking for in my apology? What troubles them the most about what I did? Was my transgression perceived as a personal injury, betrayal of the relationship, or betrayal of the code of behavior of our group?
If you are not certain, consider how a wounded party most often discusses on themselves do they concentrate on their own personal qualities, their main relationships, or the significant communities to which they belong? Knowing something on how the person you aggrieved thinks of him or herself is your first evidence to what might be bothering them most, and may help you to apologize in the best way.
When I’m sad, everyone seems to be sad. I do not feel a part of the group. I usually guide the group, or am a key to it. I usually don’t mind about the current group, but the future one. Like, my family right now means crouch. When I insult them, it effects very little. But my future family means much more to me than the present. If you endanger my future family, or make fun of my idea of this future family, I’m hurt. And I feel for not just myself, but all people.
Copyright by Lucy who likes shopping online, going fishing, often searches replica coach purses and fashion things on the Internet.
没有评论:
发表评论